How the Guanches Got to the Canaries
Many writers who investigated
the problem of the Guanches were puzzled by the fact that the natives of
the Canaries detested the sea, and never sailed it at all. So, it is pertinent
to ask, after them, how did the Guanches get to the isolated Canaries in
the first place? The answer seems to be rather simple, after all. They
were brought as passengers in the ships of seafaring peoples such as the
Phoenicians, the Etruscans, the Minoan Cretans, and so forth. Indeed, the
ancient records are full of references to the "ships of Tarshish" being
used by passengers and migrants of several different nations.
When the White Ethiopians
who survived the Atlantean cataclysm emigrated to the distant Occident
in their ships under the guidance of admirals like Aeneas, Hercules, Phoroneos,
and Hu Gadarn and, perhaps, Noah, Canopus and Jason they settled in colonies
along the way, on every coast and every island that looked promising. The
legends are certainly founded in actual fact, and these fleets of ocean
worth vessels are the ones allegorized as the Ark of Noah in the Bible
or as the Argonavis in Greek legends.
It was thus that Mauritania
was settled by the Berbers, Lebanon by the Phoenicians, Crete by the Minoans, Italy by the Etruscans,
the British Islands and Brittany by the Celts and, of course, the Canaries
by the Guanches. Many of these emigrants were, as is usually the case,
mere passengers who never knew how to sail or, even less, how to design
and build sea-worthy ships strong enough to sail the open, rough ocean,
a feat very hard to accomplish in antiquity. Such huge sailships the "ships of Tarshish" of Biblical traditions are attested from remotest antiquity, for instance in the Gerzean ceramics of pre-Dynastic Egypt, which date from about 5,500 BP or so.
In this way, the Guanches
were stranded on the Canaries, and the enigma which has defied solution
for millennia is naturally explained. The ancient peripluses like those
of Hanno and Himilco relate similar expeditions and even the establishment
of such insular colonies. Such is also the meaning of myths like the one
of Aeneas and his fleet fleeing from the destroyed, sunken Troy or, also,
of the Biblical relate of Noah and his clan repeopling the Islands of the
Nations, and founding the different nations of mankind.
1 Many
authorities refute the usual derivation of the name of America originally
applied to Brazil and South America from the name of Alberigo Vespucci,
whose name was later altered into that of Amerigo in order to comply with
the fanciful etymology. Alberigo was an obscure scribe, and would hardly
deserve the honor. The name of Armorica was that of the Brittany in Roman
times. It is usually derived from the Celtic ar-mor meaning "over the seas".
Many legends connect Armorica with the sunken realm of Ys, the Celtic counterpart
of Atlantis.
More likely, the true origin
of Armorica's name is from the Dravida ar-mor-ika, meaning "remains of
the land sunken under the seas". The name of America, which the Conquistadores
learnt from the American natives, likewise seems to come from the Dravida
am-mor-ika, meaning just about the same or, more literally, "remains of
the marshy land sunken under the seas". Interestingly enough, these meanings
are rather close to that of the epeira ges (or "outlying land") of Plato
and others, and which embodies the idea of a mountainous fringe left behind
when the flatter land sunk away. This name, as applied to the Americas,
was an extension of that of Indonesia, whose actual situation indeed corresponds
to actual fact.
Back
2 The
"Reds" are one of the Hindu four castes, Brahmans (or priests), Kshatryas
(or warriors), Vaishyas (or bourgeois) and Sudras (or serfs). These also
correspond to the four primordial races of humanity, personified in the
Bible by Noah and his three sons. In modern terms, these also correspond
to the real four races of humanity: whites, reds, yellows and blacks, which
are precisely the heraldic colours of the four castes (varnas = "colours").
The name of the Phoenicians
derives from "red" (phoinikes) in Greek. The radix cham is of obscure origin,
and is said to mean "black", as usually interpreted in connection with
the Egyptians, who called their country Khamis or Khemis. But this is wrong,
and the true etym is "red" or, rather, "candent", as in the Latin chama
("flame"). In contrast to what many authorities affirm, the land of Egypt
is whitish, rather than black, due to the sand it embodies even in the
irrigated regions. The idea is that the Chams, formerly white as the Guanches,
were "charred" by the volcanism that destroyed their land, and became the
Ethiopians, that is "the fiery faced" (aith-opes). But, as we already said, this darkening of the originally blond Atlanteans was the result of "too much admixture with mortal blood", as Plato discloses in his Critias.
Ultimately, the radix cham
or, rather, kham or khem, derives from the Dravida, where it means "red",
"fiery", "flaming", "gold". It designated the red races which formed the
bellicose Kshatrya caste, and which was mainly composed of the Dravidian
races. The name was also applied to the wild red dog of the Indies (Cuon
alpinus), with which the Reds identified themselves. Hence, the fact that
the Chamites were often equated to "dogs". The name was applied to the
Canaries ("Isles of the Dogs") because of the Chams, rather than the dogs,
as Pliny falsely alleges. Same thing with Khemis (Egypt), "the Land of
the Chams". The very name of the Guanches derives from Guan-che or, rather,
Kham-che, meaning the nation (che or ge) of the Chams". The reader interested in more details on this should consult our article on the Dravidian origin of the Guanche language.
Back
3 The
name of the Leucades derives from the Greek leukas, the feminine form of
leukos ("white", "shiny"). Legendarily, their name is ascribed to Leukates, a boy who, desired by Apollo, threw himself from the cliff in order to escape the
relentless persecution of the god. Sometimes, the cliff is directly associated with
Apollo Leukadios, who had a temple at its summit. The Leucadian Rocks became
famous as the place from which non-corresponded lovers or those wishing
purification committed suicide, a ritual known as katapontismos. Leukates
is the obvious twin of Apollo, the two being the aliases of Atlas and Hesperus,
who also found a similar death.
The Leucades were also obscurely
identified with the Elysian Fields, the Greek counterpart of Eden or Paradise
and, more exactly, of the Islands of the Blest which are no other than
Atlantis. It is interesting to note that the name relates to the radix
luk- meaning "fiery","shiny","white", and which partakes of the name of Lucifer, Lug and other such luminous, fallen deities.
All such gods are invariably
connected with Atlantis, and are said to inhabit volcanic peaks, which
indeed deserve the name of "luminous". Such is the case of the Teyde volcano
of Tenerife, whose name means "The Luminous One". Coincidentally or not,
the fact is that the Teyde volcano is the legendary abode of Guayota, the
luminous All-Creator of the Guanches. Guayota is the perfect counterpart of the above mentioned luminiferous gods, as well as of other chthonian, smithing gods such as Hephaistos and Maya, the great architect of Lanka. Lanka was the archetype of Atlantis, in Hindu traditions, and of all such fallen Paradises, including the Celestial Jerusalem.
Back
|